Craddick radio advertisement is a stand against Dewhurst [13 Aug 2005|11:07am] This week, the Speaker of the Texas House of Representative made a public statement in a radio advertisement denouncing Senate Bill 8 by Senator Shapiro. Senate Bill 8 is the Senate plan to public school finance “reform.” In reality, this bill, passed by the Texas Senate in the second special session of the year, keeps the status quo of the public schools and adds $6 billion of public education funding. Senate Bill 8 is a slap in the face to conservatives who want real public school finance reform. The House plan that was passed in the regular session of the Texas Legislature and again in the first called special session this year put some real reforms on the table. The Texas Senate balked at these reforms and removed from the bill. Some of the reforms included having a uniform school board election date in November to coincide with the statewide elections, mandating that a certain percentage of new money allocated goes straight to the classroom and not to school administrators, and a performance based teacher pay raise instead of an across the board pay raise. The original House plan did include a payroll tax proposal which would have hurt businesses and virtually created a statewide income tax, but beyond this point, the House plan has many merits. The House plan would have added $3 billion to public school funding, which in the opinion of most fiscal conservatives, is another $3 billion of taxpayer money wasted. The Senate removed much of these reforms during the regular session, the first called special session, and then watched laughingly as the House imploded two weeks ago and struck down the very plan the House had already passed twice this year and that had the support of Governor Perry. The Senate then took a stab at school finance reform with Senate Bill 8. Senate Bill 8 actually will move Texas away from local control of schools through mandatory teacher pay raises (taking more money from the local budgets to pay for a state mandate), giving the Texas Education Agency more control over curriculum instead of the elected State Board of Education, and adding additional enrichment taxes to pay for education. How the nineteen Senate Republicans who voted for this plan to stomach this is beyond my ability to comprehend. The Speaker’s radio advertisement brings the fight back to the House and is a direct stand against Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst. The House is the only portion of government that can appropriate new money, so without House support, Senate Bill 8 is dead. The Lieutenant Governor position has always been known as the most powerful position in Texas government. Well, if Speaker Craddick is successful in stonewalling Senate Bill 8, this Lieutenant Governor will go down in history as one of the weakest individuals to hold that office. But, Craddick knows that the only way to motivate the Texas House to pass meaningful reform is for them to have a common enemy. So far this year, the House’s common enemies have been the Speaker and each other. By taking this stand in public, the Speaker is making the Senate the common enemy of the House. This is a very bold play by Speaker Craddick, but the outcome is still uncertain. Until the general public becomes educated about the inefficiencies in public school finance and wants to do more to fix the problem besides complaining, there will never be meaningful reform in Texas, no matter which political leader is creating radio advertisements. By Randy A. Samuelson State Chairman Young Conservatives of Texas post comment

It is Now Time to Get it Right [06 Aug 2005|07:28pm] by Randy A. Samuelson State Chairman, Young Conservatives of Texas This special session of the State Legislature has been very interesting. A bill that almost passed the regular session was killed by a filibuster by Senator John Whitmire of Houston in the first special session and then railroaded in the House in the second special session. The Legislature is now compelled to come to an agreement and do what they were elected to do - pass legislation that provides for the basic services for the people of Texas. I believe in my heart that many Legislators want to intentionally fail in this mission and let the Texas Supreme Court decide the matter so the Legislators will not be held accountable next year during re-election bids. During this year’s regular and first called special session, the Legislature spent time arguing over how to finance increases in public education spending rather than how to make public education in Texas more efficient and better overall. Most agree that the current Robin Hood plan needs an overhaul, but the proposed solutions (House and Senate versions of HB 3) would have created new problems, while not doing enough to fix the underlying Robin Hood problems. Fortunately, House and Senate Republicans could not reach an agreement, and although the hated Robin Hood system is still in place, the public was spared of a virtual state income tax, an increased sales tax, and expanded reliance on hidden business taxes. Most Democrats opposed HB 3, because it increased the regressive sales tax and did not raise enough money to finance their insatiable appetite for public education spending. (Of course, they also wanted to see a Republican Governor, Speaker, and Lieutenant Governor fail on a major issue.) The State of Texas does not have a revenue problem; it has a spending problem. The amount of money that Texas takes in and spends on public education is among the highest in the nation. Texas Public Policy Foundation has done significant research regarding public schools in Texas and comparative studies nationwide. Here are just some of the results: ✫ Texans invested just over $30 billion in public education during the 2002-03 school year. ✫ 36 percent of state revenue is invested in public education – Texas ranks second among the 50 states in total education expenditures. ✫ Texas ranks 3rd in the nation for the percentage of total state expenditures devoted to public education. ✫To pay for public education, the average Texan works 90 days a year – up from 63 days in 1970. ✫ Over four million children attend Texas public schools – Texas has the 2nd largest student enrollment population in the U.S. ✫There are 1,224 school districts and charter schools in Texas, providing 571,119 full-time jobs ✫ Texas spent more than $6,700 per student in 2004, but only 50 percent of those dollars reached the classroom. ✫ Austin ISD increased instructional spending 27 percent from 1997 to 2002 but increased extracurricular activities spending 134 percent and data processing spending 344 percent. ✫ Student performance is generally not improved by increasing school funding, across-the-board pay increases for teachers, increasing the number of teachers with advanced degrees, or decreasing class size. Texas spends nearly $7,100 per student in its public schools, but only about 50% of that money makes it to the actual classroom. This efficiency is almost as bad as some fly-by-night businesses that come into Austin after hailstorms, take your money, do shoddy repair work, and run! Yet the State Legislature is looking at increasing spending even more and the taxpayers are letting them get away with it because they buy into the common yet completely fictitious assumption that increasing spending on education improves educational outcomes. When the Legislature takes another hack at school finance reform, members will discuss various proposals to shift the tax burden around. However, none of those proposals are likely to address the force that is driving the property tax and school finance crises, which is financial inefficiency in the public school system. Until that problem is addressed, we will have an oppressive tax system, regardless of how those tax dollars are levied. Instead, the Legislature will most likely go the way of least resistance - cut property taxes (which desperately needs to be done) and increase sales and business taxes to finance the property tax relief and the $3-6 billion in new education spending. The general public will pat their legislators on the back by re-electing them, oblivious that the state is now wasting even more of their hard-earned money. Even worse, this ugly problem will reemerge in ten years as out-of-control spending pushes the expanded business taxes to oppressive levels that warrant relief. Public school finance will be addressed again in ten years because we will have the same issues then as we do now: underperforming public schools, inefficiency in spending, and an inequitable tax system. Any time you hear an elected official say, “We are doing this for the children” you should immediately translate this to, “We want to increase taxes, increase spending, and throw your money away so we can get re-elected next year.” We were told this in 1990 during the last school finance debate, yet our public schools have performed worse and bureaucratic spending by school administrators has run out of control since then. Do you really think public schools in general need more money? One high school in El Paso had so much money that they built a water slide in their parking lot! As one of the leaders of this generation of young men and women, I feel it is my duty to tell the State Legislature to get it done right by stressing efficiency in government spending, open up competition in education through a voucher system, and providing teachers and classrooms, not administrators, with the bulk of the money for education. Right now, only about 50 percent of the money spent on education goes to the classrooms. Governor Perry’s plan would unilaterally move it to 65 percent into the classroom. This is still not enough money going to the classroom. We should be striving to put at least 80 percent of our tax money into the classroom. Anything less only strengthens the bureaucracy and takes money away from actual education. It will take a voucher system to make public schools more creative in their approach to actually fulfill their primary job, teaching students, and to ensure that our tax money is spent efficiently. One axiom is clear - public education spending is not about improving schools but about getting politicians elected. This is evidenced by Governor Perry and Comptroller Strayhorn holding press conferences almost simultaneously on a Saturday in June - the former to call a Special Session and the latter to declare her intent to run for Governor and blast the incumbent for vetoing the public education budget. The Legislature has another chance to get pubic education done right this time by being fiscally responsible and actually encouraging teachers to teach students. The real question is how many more opportunities the taxpayers will give the Legislators to waste our time and money haggling over peripherals and ignoring the underlying problem. post comment

navigation [ viewing | most recent entries ]